All Posts (9261)
As a general overview to Iranian customs, the country has also preserved many pre-Islamic customs.
The family is central to Iranian life and they put it at the core of their social structure. It is custom for female relatives to be protected from outside influences and are taken care of at all times. For this reason, it is inappropriate to ask questions about an Iranian’s wife or other female relatives.
Although the custom in Iran, for the majority of people, is to only have 1 or 2 children, extended family is usually very close which forms a tight network. It is custom for family loyalties to be prioritized against any other relationships and nepotism in Iran is generally considered a good thing.
Iranians typically see themselves as having two distinct identities: “zaher” (public) and “batin” (private). When they are in public, they must conform to accepted modes of behavior, which are often legally dictated.
The only part of their lives where they can be themselves is within their homes and among their inner circle. It is custom in Iran for the inner circle to form the basis of a person’s social and business network. Friendship is very important and extends into business. The people from the inner circle can be relied upon to: offer advice, help find a job, or cut through bureaucracy.
The stories carried a lot of similarities to western ones. There was a lot of repetition (great for language learning!), and the characters were often personified animals and elements, reminiscent of Aesop's fables. Each story was centered on a message, a moral lesson for children. Though English stories are also usually teaching tools, the Iranian morals were a bit different.
The first story was about kindness and hospitality. An old woman welcomed strangers into her home on a cold night, and they turned out to have skills and became her family. I think Western fairy tales tend to be much more grim, like DON'T talk to strangers, because they'll mislead you and then eat your grandmother.
The next story had a similarly cheerful moral: everyone can be the strongest in his or her own way. It's interesting, this is a very modern message in Western standards, which makes me wonder when these were written. It gave the impression of being old stories everyone knew. I guess Beowulf, with his warrior prowess, wouldn't fit in to Iranian children's stories. The host commented after the story that everyone is endowed with strength and greatness, but "perhaps best kind of strength is that which comes from love and wisdom," because it benefits others. This is really telling - instead of strength in what I would call a traditional sense (i.e. brute strength), this strength is measured by its power to help the most people.
The host adds comments at the end, which happen to be religious things (like being strong is especially in spirit, or everyone is perfect in heaven's eyes). That either means that it's acceptable to teach children about religion on TV, or that the TV station isn't secular.
I first tried learning the list simply by reading and speaking it over and over. This didn't stick. I then, in groups of 5 or so, wrote and spoke them over and over. This repetition worked really well, and now I know quite a few of the words - though I still need to work on some further down the list.
I also watched an animation in farsi about a family on youtube. First there were some quick statements about the family, which after a few times through I could pick out the words for mother, father, and sister. Then, the written form of "family" was shown and repeated - I found I could pick out the letters and sounds in the word easily. Finally, with a cute little animation, the words were spoken over and over, "Mother, Father, Daughter, Son." I don't know how much this will help me, since I already remembered those words, but I now have an auditory reference for the basic family words.
Today I met with my learning partner Albar and our topic was one of my two main goals. We learned about soccer. We both together came up with words that are part of the game for example referee, uniform, ball and other words I should know so I could understand during a game on TV or a sports article.
We came up with a lot of words and he also translated for me some phrases I could use like for example the referee showed him a yellow card. Good thing I already learned the colors. Many words are similar to english words but most of them are written differently. They just sound the same and they ofcourse have the same meaning as english.
In the last 10 minutes of our meeting we watched a video on YouTube of Galatasaray and another turkish team. The commentator was speaking Turkish and he was speaking really fast but I did get some of the words we talked about earlier like goal, shoot and yellow card. Galatasaray was in front by 1-0 but in extra time the other team tied the game. The commentator said that Galatasaray was struggling for the top in the beginning of the game and I guess this draw was really not a good result for them.
Next time we said to continue and watch more videos because it is a good way to learn the phrases and try to keep up even though they speak really fast.
A: Hello. How are you?
B: Im doing good, thank you. How about you?
A: Im doing good. What is your name?
B: My name is Stella. How about yours?
A: My name is Andreas. Nice to meet you.
B: Nice to meet you too.
A: Where are you from?
B: I am American. How about you?
A: I am Cypriot. How old are you?
B: I am twenty years old. How about you?
A: I am twenty too.
A: Something happened, i have to go.
One seemingly circumstantial facet of the language is the absence of q, w and x. Although these letters are absent in Turkish, they are present in Kurdish, which is spoken by many in the Southeast. As only the official Turkish language is allowed on state-issued identification documents, the Kurdish names for people and towns are limited to colloquial use. Further, Kurdish has been limited throughout various periods in modern history, including, until 2002, in broadcast media (television broadcast was allowed in 2006). While this limitation on non-official languages may be supported for reasons nation-building or cultural unity, it is controversial that foreign loan words could be used on television as early as 1992 (Show TV as the oft-cited example).
The Ergenekon and Balyoz cases have been perceived differently among disparate factions in the Turkish political spectrum. By some, the investigations represent the secret goings-on of the "deep state," which is representative of the military and judicial branches that are not under civilian or electoral oversight. Others perceive the cases as an attempt by the ruling party to discredit its main opposition. The main opposition party, the CHP, perceives the military as an effective check on the possibly islamist orientation of the AKP. The nationalist party, the MHP, sees the military as the most important actor promoting the interests of the Turkish state and would like to see the military's influence expanded, not reduced. The Kurdish parties are possibly the most sympathetic to the AKP's efforts, as the military and judiciary have been the most rigid opponents to Kurdish interests. This point has been magnified by the recent court ruling banning the pro-Kurdish DTP from political activities.
No matter the intentions of the AKP, a series of military coups from 1960-1980 (and a "post-modern" coup in 1997) give credibility to fears of military intervention. The cases of 1960 and 1980 are especially infamous for the military's role in stabilizing volatile political situations. The 1980 coup, as the most recent intervention where military force was used, is remembered for its violence and persecution of political prisoners throughout Turkey, with Diyarbakir prison as the often used example of brutality.
Thus is it credible to fear military intervention in political life, but the connection between those arrested and the plots they are accused of planning is somewhat dubious at best, and political farce (saçma) at worst. Recently, there have been calls for early elections and constitutional amendments to address the most contentious aspects of the AKP. The recent regional elections saw a decrease in support for the AKP, but it is yet to be seen whether the base of AKP popularity will decrease below the margin of plurality in the coming months and years.
Last week,I attended a Hillel sponsored lunch & learn with Neil Lazarus, a well known expert on communications specializing in mass media and Israel. The talk centered on the Israeli military action in Gaza in early 2009 and the way that the media portrayed. The general idea behind his talk was that people's perspective on the situation is determined almost exclusively by the exact way that the media wants to portray whatever it is that they are presenting, rather than actually allowing the viewer to gather facts and make their own conclusion on their own. Mr. Lazarus then showed us a video to illustrate this phenomenon (link provided below).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47LCLoidJh4
The general point that he made was that as the video says it is easy to miss something that you are not looking for, or furthermore, that isn't even shown. Essentially his whole point was that we cannot allow ourselves or others to make decisions about the Israeli situation or other situations without trying to gather as many facts as possible.