The article in the Times about Immersion versus formal class training was very insightful. I would have liked if it went into more detail about the game and the sample size, as well as a few other details that may have been significant, but the article did peak my interest. I have always heard that immersion is the best way to learn a language because you learn more than just grammar. I have found that friends who go abroad come back with a stronger sense of the culture and sound much more natural when speaking the language of the country.
For this reason, I have decided that I would like to go abroad to South Korea sometime before I graduate so that I can learn Korean in the most organic setting. I know enough that I would be able to add to my foundation, which I believe is another important factor when considering immersion as a teaching tool. Additionally, I would like to learn more about Korean culture beyond what is seen on screen, which is my primary source of instruction.
It was quite interesting to read that they believe immersion may one day be a useful tool in helping those with brain injuries. That was certainly something they could have elaborated on, but it seems probable and quite useful. I went on and looked up information about this topic, and I found an interesting website that touched upon it more in depth.
Check it out if you're interested!