One thing in particular that interests me about Malta is that despite a chaotic history of political rulings, it has been able to develop successfully as a nation. The country has existed independently, as a republic, for less than 50 years (December 1974) and joined the EU in 2008. Over the course of history, Malta has been conquered by multiple other countries that have had a tremendous impact on the development of Maltese culture. It is surprising to me, though, that the disorganized political ownership has not left the country in worse shape.
Malta was first discovered around 5200BC and was first colonized by the Phoenicians around 800BC. Following this, the Roman domination started in 218BC, followed by the Arab (870) conquests until 1090. During the Middle Ages, Malta was conquered by four different groups (Normans, Swabians, Angevins, Aragonese). It was said the Arab rule was one of the harshest, resulting in the migration of many people to nearby Sicily and significant death. In 1530, though, the Knights of St. John arrived in Malta to revive the society and introduce Renaissance ideals. The population experienced significant growth during this time period and the reign was more positive than the last. The period under St. John was short-lived, as Napolean Bonaparte conquered Malta from the Knights in 1798. Similar to the last, the French occupation of Malta only lasted a couple of years until the British officially established Malta as a British Crown Colony. It was during this political period that the Maltese natives begin to fight for self-government and independent ruling. It was in 1964 that Malta was granted independence within the British Commonwealth and in 1974 that Malta became its own republic. From this point onward, Malta has pushed to become its own independent nation within the EU/Eurozone.
It strikes me as unusual that an island in the Mediterranean, conquered by so many other large world powers, is functioning fairly well and developed today. It seems more typical that small island regions, like Malta, are left extremely resource-depleted, dependent, and underdeveloped after experiencing the political rulership of so many different parties. On multiple development indexes, Malta tends to fall just below Italian rankings and above some of the other countries in the Mediterranean. For example, Malta’s GDP per capita for 2017 was approximately $27,145.81 and Italy’s GDP for 2017 was $34,877.83. Other close GDP per capita approximates include Cyprus at $29,432.67 and Greece at $23,027.41. Although the GDP figures appear low compared to US per capita GDP ($53,128.54), it is important to consider factors such as nation size and adjusted rate for PPP, that can render Malta’s GDP more valuable that it seems at first glance. On the Human Development Index, Malta ranks an overall .878, in comparison to Italy that ranks .88 and the US at .924. In the areas of life expectancy at birth and inequality-adjusted HDI, Malta actually ranks higher than the US.
The first area that I looked towards to better understand what features of Malta left it stable, despite thousands of years of political conquest, is geography. I am studying the effect of the “natural resource curse” in my Economics of Developing Nations class and one thing I noticed about Malta is that it is not particularly rich in any one natural resource. I researched online and discovered that tourism, small-scale agriculture, and some manufacturing are the primary sources fueling GDP. The service industry (88.1% of GDP) makes up most of the economy, manufacturing (10.6%) comes in second, and agriculture comes in third (1.3%). This type of GDP composition, service-oriented, is reflective of a very industrially developed country. The fact that Malta was not rich in resources such as metals, agricultural products, or oil could have possibly protected it from exploitation over time. As a next step, I am very curious to better understand the development of similar island-nations, with a disorganized political histories.
Another factor of the Maltese economy I would like to explore more is the potential impact of immigration. Malta has been considered a discouraging addition to the EU because of its role in North African immigration into Italy. Malta is located conveniently close to Libya and Tunisia (North Africa), so it serves as a first stop for illegal immigrants. Surprisingly, it seems that the Maltese economy may actually have a need for migrant workers, considering it has an extremely low unemployment rate filled by its large working-age population and increasing economic growth. While conducting research online, I found that the Maltese government is outwardly very resistant to African immigration, but many workers are slowly becoming integrated into the informal economy. I hope to do more research about how the culture and backgrounds of these people will become a part of the larger Maltese story.