If I received a research grant to conduct a linguistic study focused on ASL, I would first establish strong connections with members of the Deaf community and relevant organizations. Building trust and ensuring ethical research practices would be essential, particularly because Deaf culture has historically been marginalized and misrepresented in linguistic research, often simply regarded as a manual version of English. However, ASL is a fully developed natural language with its own grammar, syntax, and cultural context.
Next, I would design a mixed-methods study that includes both qualitative and quantitative approaches. I would collect video data of natural ASL conversations in a variety of settings, such as schools, community centers, and social gatherings, allowing me to analyze authentic use of the language. I would also conduct interviews with Deaf participants to gain insight into their language attitudes, identity, and experiences. Since ASL is a visual-gestural language, video recording would be the primary method of data collection, ensuring that important features like facial expressions, body movement, and spatial referencing are preserved.
In terms of what I would investigate, I would focus on several key structural components of ASL. One major area would be phonology, which in ASL includes parameters such as handshape, location, movement, palm orientation, and non-manual signals. I would examine how these elements function similarly to sounds in spoken languages and how pairs are formed.
Another important component I would invstigate is morphology, specifically how ASL uses classifiers to convey meaning by representing objects, movement, and spatial relationships.
Syntax would also be a central focus of my research. ASL has a flexible word order, often described as topic-comment structure, which differs significantly from English sentence patterns. I would analyze how signers use space and facial expressions to mark grammatical relationships, such as questions or negation. Additionally, I would explore the use of constructed action, which are important discourse features that allow signers to depict multiple perspectives within a conversation.
My last area of investigation would be dialectical variation. Just like spoken languages, ASL varies based on factors such as region, age, race, and educational background. For example, I might examine variations between older and younger signers or differences influenced by historical segregation in deaf education.
Replies